Mitch McConnell Wants Supreme Court to See the Evidence of 2020 Election Fraud Not Done in Previous Rulings to Not See

Translate:

In his recent interview with CNN’s Manu Raju, senator Mitch McConnell said that if the Supreme Court doesn’t see evidence of the 2020 election rigged for Biden then the result should be accepted, but since the Supreme Court didn’t see the evidence, refusing to see it, isn’t McConnell saying the Supreme Court should come to a decision based on the facts, to evaluate the evidence rather than hide from it?