Online Gamblers Putting Their Money More on Republican Candidates Yet How Can They Know Rigging Won’t Affect?

Translate:

Are the gamblers backing Laxalt to win in Nevada giving him a 67% chance of winning because they’ve determined that the election won’t be rigged? Would they be favoring him even more if they were quite certain that election won’t be rigged unto a Mastos victory? What about Walker in Georgia being given a 58% chance of winning. and Oz in Pennsylvania too by that amount, would that number be alot higher if the gamblers were certain the elections won’t be rigged sufficient to change the real results?