A few days ago Albert Bourla the CEO of Pfizer said that the effectiveness of the first two mRNA “vaccines” is now waned down to essentially nil, so why would the Supreme Court uphold mandates forcing those shots unless taking the third (and the fourth, fifth, sixth?) would be included in the mandates, considering too that only about 15% of the U. S. population has taken the third shot?
All Material Copyright The Right Sway 2022
