Wouldn’t Kirsten Gillibrand Be Aggressively Contesting President Trump’s Tweet If She Really Hadn’t Insinuated Sex?

Translate:

Doesn’t it seem odd that Kirsten Gillibrand does not want to talk about what really happened in her meeting with Trump to solicit campaign contributions? Wouldn’t you think she would go out of her way to say what happened if she in fact did not inject sexuality into her presentation?