Because a “hybrid” animal is from two “species” interbred, why shouldn’t the “hybrid” plus its parents be considered one kind of animal? Of course they should be but can’t in the darwinists’ scheme of things considering that if infer-fertility were the key component of classification, there would be realized only about twenty thousand kinds not species of animals, the biblical kinds in modern scientific jargon called syngameons, the human one among them.
